(no subject)

current mood: contemplative
I was just reading my communication theories book for Wednesday's class and I found a really interesting excerpt. It's pretty self explanatory once you read it...
"As a case in point, Pearce believes the polarization of the electorate in the U.S. is both the cause and the product of communications patterns that he describes as reciprocated diatribe. He claims that what President George W. Bush labeled the "war on terror" is reproduced and sustained by patterns of communication that dismiss and demonize the other. For example, the way President Bush responded to the 9/11 attacks set in motion a sequence of events that have affected us all. In the conflict between al-Qaeda and the U.S., both sides are acting morally according to their own understanding of the universe. Yet it's no surprise that each side calling the other "evil" isn't likely to resolve the conflict. In an attempt to show another way of responding, Pearce wrote an alternative version of the speech that the President made to the nation on the night of the attack. One portion of Pearce's version goes as follows:
'If we are to understand why people hate us so much, we will have to understand how the world looks from their perspective. And if we are to respond effectively to protect ourselves, we must understand those whose sense of history and purpose are not like our own. It is tempting to see this vicious attack as the result of madmen trying to destroy our civilization, and our response as a war of "good" against "evil." But if we are to understand what happened here today, and if we are to act effectively in the days to come, we must develop more sophisticated stories than these about the world, about our place in it, and about the consequences of our actions.
This is a terrorist attack. If we are in a state of war, it is a different kind of war than we have ever fought before. Terrorists are not capable of occupying our country or meeting our armies on the field of battle. They hope to destroy our confidence, to disrupt our way of life. They hope that we will destroy ourselves by the way we respond to the atrocities that they commit. Our first reaction, that of wanting revenge, to lash out at those who have injured us so, is almost surely the wrong response because it makes us accomplices of what they're trying to achieve.'"
1 quick question. How come Pearce isn't our president?
That's what I would like to know.





















